Birdwatching

24 Responses

  1. Nikita Lebedev Nikita Lebedev

    Which one do you like more?

    over 2 years ago

  2. Julius Seniūnas Julius Seniūnas

    i think that previous one - eye looks more natural. However , both of them kick asss !

    likes

    over 2 years ago

  3. Colin Tierney Colin Tierney

    the other for sure. i agree with julius...looks more natural.

    over 2 years ago

  4. Alenushka Advertising Alenushka Advertising

    Cute eye, Nikita!

    over 2 years ago

  5. Emir Ayouni Emir Ayouni

    Both look great. Love the concept. Just think the first one felt a bit claustrophobic compared to this one. But then again, the previous one looks way more natural.

    over 2 years ago

  6. Jonathan Patterson Jonathan Patterson

    I like this one better because you don't necessarily need the eyelid to represent that it's an eye. You've done an amazing job of integrating the two concepts—this version is a testament to your impressive skills.

    likes

    over 2 years ago

  7. Zach Roszczewski Zach Roszczewski

    This one for me, Love this concept!

    over 2 years ago

  8. Ricky Linn Ricky Linn

    This!

    over 2 years ago

  9. Nikita Lebedev Nikita Lebedev

    I like this one because minimalism is a gem itself. Although previous shot is more natural and has a deeper sense of illusion. Crazy hard!

    over 2 years ago

  10. Adam Coulombe Adam Coulombe

    This one is much much better. Way simpler and clearer. The shape of the eye is much more elegant

    over 2 years ago

  11. Nick Hood Nick Hood

    Very nice. I like this one better.

    over 2 years ago

  12. Geoff Muskett Geoff Muskett

    I like this one best, very clever the way the birds body forms the circle eye highlight! Great stuff!

    over 2 years ago

  13. Daniel Keller Daniel Keller

    Yea, simply this one works better to me!

    over 2 years ago

  14. Damian Vila Damian Vila

    I like this one better. :)

    over 2 years ago

  15. Aldrich Tan Aldrich Tan

    this is crazy!

    over 2 years ago

  16. Inka Mathew Inka Mathew

    This one for sure. Simpler and more balanced. Great logo.

    over 2 years ago

  17. Jerron Ames Jerron Ames

    This one, lose the eyelid.

    over 2 years ago

  18. Kamlesh Munot Kamlesh Munot

    Superb!

    over 2 years ago

  19. Tom Ralston Tom Ralston

    This one - less is more. Nice design!

    over 2 years ago

  20. Pete White Pete White

    beautiful

    over 2 years ago

  21. Nikita Lebedev Nikita Lebedev

    Thank you guys! Please share your thoughts on the font choice: http://s1.ipicture.ru/uploads/20111212/I5tY3chv.png

    over 2 years ago

  22. Adam Coulombe Adam Coulombe

    typeface #3 or #4. The way the top of the "c" and "a" curl in complements the logo nicely. As far as the weight goes, I personally like the look of #4 but it may not be strong enough. It's hard to make a good decision without seeing a few sample applications. this would give a better sense of how well it holds up.

    likes

    over 2 years ago

  23. Andrew Edwards Andrew Edwards

    I prefer this one. The one with the eyelid looks a little more sinister. With it being called bird watching it might be misinterpreted as something a bit more pervy.

    So clean. Love it.

    over 2 years ago

  24. Michael Rowley Michael Rowley

    I recommend the video 'Helvetica'. In it Paula Scher says Helvetica is the font of war. She says, 'I thought the typeface Helvetica was the cleanest, most boring, most Fascistic, really repressive typeface. And I hated everything that was designed in Helvetica.'

    I like treatment 4 from your choices.

    about 2 years ago

keyboard shortcuts: previous shot next shot L or F like