This or That - Feedback please

38 Responses (page 1 of 2)

  1. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    I've been working on several different concepts for a new homepage for InVision and could use your help...

    Which version connects with you more and/or peaks your interest?

    View the attachment for real pixels and both versions

    Press L to show some love.

    Follow the InVision Team

    Not collaborating with InVision yet? It's free -- Sign-up today!

    likes

    2 months ago

  2. Kyle Schmitz Kyle Schmitz

    I think the office picture works better but maybe not so dark? If there was a picture that better represented 'collaboration' I would choose that. Photos of people do not tell me anything, plus he doesn't look very excited.

    likes

    2 months ago

  3. Nicolas Bussière Nicolas Bussière

    2 ! :)

    likes

    2 months ago

  4. Ilja Miskov Ilja Miskov

    Looks great!

    2 months ago

  5. Luke Etheridge Luke Etheridge

    @Aaron Stump First off, really great work!

    Further to @Kyle Schmitz comment, I agree about the office pic version but made slightly lighter. I think a better photo for collaboration would be two designers chatting/sketching/designing at a desk maybe?

    The other version? Unfortunately everytime I see this photo of this guy, and no offence to him at all, but I cannot stop laughing at @Incredipixel's comment on @Bill's shot here. It still cracks me up :D

    likes

    2 months ago

  6. Marc Reisen Marc Reisen

    It reminds me a bit of http://www.crowdpilot.me/ I guess if the "angle" leads the users eye to somewhere purposeful it would make sense. Or if it happened to imply an interaction or animation that would happen on the site it would work. The tangent and the way the text falls off the edge of the dark edge is where my eyes go, and it seems a bit distracting. Wonderful grid and photography though...cheers!

    2 months ago

  7. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Marc Reisen the image of the split screen is simply to show the two versions I am considering. Its not intended to be the final design. The full versions attached show the two different concepts in detail

    likes

    2 months ago

  8. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Kyle Schmitz thanks for the feedback

    2 months ago

  9. Luke Etheridge Luke Etheridge

    @Marc Reisen I think you may have missed the attachment bud? The shot above is not the design. They are two different designs, both of which are in the attached file.

    likes

    2 months ago

  10. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Luke Etheridge thanks for the feedback. I was unaware of @Bill design version using that image. The image is really just a placeholder but the concept is still to show designers that use InVision

    2 months ago

  11. Jered Odegard Jered Odegard

    The second one seems "cooler" but that might just be me not liking the first photograph. The photo of a single person has a much more personal feel to it, but not sure if that's appropriate for the brand.

    likes

    2 months ago

  12. Marc Reisen Marc Reisen

    @Aaron Stump Thanks for the update. Understood, just not very clear. Happy decision making!

    likes

    2 months ago

  13. Marc Reisen Marc Reisen

    @Luke Etheridge I saw both attachments. But the way the image was advertised in the composition looked like a "meshing" of the two. Happy to see the community responds to the feedback so thoroughly!

    likes

    2 months ago

  14. Shaun Moynihan Shaun Moynihan

    Initial thoughts on each concept...

    This.) The full-colored background featuring an individual makes more sense if you're targeting designers. Feels more personal.

    That.) The monochromatic background and non-personal photo gives of a corporate vibe so I'd say this concept is more appropriate for targeting businesses/agencies.

    I really like both. I'd have to say the bottom would be better overall in terms of readability since some photos would have better/worse backgrounds for the white text.

    Keep up the solid work @Aaron.

    likes

    2 months ago

  15. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Shaun Moynihan solid feedback... thanks!

    2 months ago

  16. Luke Etheridge Luke Etheridge

    @Marc Reisen Got ya. Hope I didn't come across as rude at all mate. Just thought I'd give it a mention.

    likes

    2 months ago

  17. Mike Arndt Mike Arndt

    #2 is solid.

    likes

    2 months ago

  18. Victor Erixon Victor Erixon

    I wouldn't do the dark overlay!

    2 months ago

  19. Mat MacQuarrie Mat MacQuarrie

    Wow, this is looking really spectacular Aaron!

    likes

    2 months ago

  20. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Mat MacQuarrie thanks man

    2 months ago

  21. Mauricio Estrella Mauricio Estrella

    I think it's easier for your customers to identify themselves and engage with the context in which the tool will be used (the office shot, showing people and computers. Perhaps a larger detail of groups of people would work even nicer?).

    If you show them a designer in the main stage shot, not all your customers will identify or engage with it, as it will probably reflect more an individual than a service.

    likes

    2 months ago

  22. Aaron Stump Aaron Stump

    @Mauricio Estrella great feedback, thanks

    likes

    2 months ago

  23. Joshua Taylor Joshua Taylor

    @Aaron Stump I'd say that if you are trying to highlight designers, a picture of the designer is way better than a workspace. That said, it seems like it would be much more effective if you had some sort of title/quote type thing for each designer. That direction is really all about selling the use case, so I feel like you need to go all the way and show not only the designer but how they use the product.
    ..maybe that is as simple as a title and a link to see how they use it.

    2 months ago

  24. Álvaro Bernal Álvaro Bernal

    Concept one!

    2 months ago

  25. Nathan Walker Nathan Walker

    You could cycle through photos of people?

    2 months ago

keyboard shortcuts: previous shot next shot L or F like