Liking how the angles match, but I wonder if now people would be too prone to reading it as L M? Perhaps fattening the width of the M a little more, and making the bevel edge a tiny bit thinner, more like your original.
Also, I hadn't envisioned the pointed M, but that's certainly a more custom-looking monogram that way.
2 Responses
Made some adjustments base off of @Mark Bult suggestion.
5 months ago
Liking how the angles match, but I wonder if now people would be too prone to reading it as L M? Perhaps fattening the width of the M a little more, and making the bevel edge a tiny bit thinner, more like your original.
Also, I hadn't envisioned the pointed M, but that's certainly a more custom-looking monogram that way.
5 months ago