Working on the final version of Segal Holdings logo. I just put a custom type that I'm not sure if it's looking good or need some retouches yet, I'll really appreciate a help on it*. Also, we're going with this color for now. Let me know your thoughs guys.
*the negative version have no compensation yet, so I think you better judge the positive one. :D
Thank you, and a happy new year for everyone! :))))
Love the direction of the type Breno! Something with the A feels a bit off... Unbalanced if you will. The right side feels a bit heavier-the axis visually looks a bit more tilted if that makes sense.
This is because the earlier version haven't this wing fold that suggest a bird body. So I've planned it without the fold. Now I have to redo this proportion. Thanks, @Konstantin! :)
9 Responses
Working on the final version of Segal Holdings logo. I just put a custom type that I'm not sure if it's looking good or need some retouches yet, I'll really appreciate a help on it*. Also, we're going with this color for now. Let me know your thoughs guys.
*the negative version have no compensation yet, so I think you better judge the positive one. :D
Thank you, and a happy new year for everyone! :))))
6 months ago
Love the direction of the type Breno! Something with the A feels a bit off... Unbalanced if you will. The right side feels a bit heavier-the axis visually looks a bit more tilted if that makes sense.
6 months ago
Love it!
I think the type looks great, but maybe just a little bit softer corners in a few select places would tie it to the logo just a bit more?
6 months ago
O ícone está BEM melhor!
A tipografia, no entanto, merece um cuidado maior. Não achei que está combinando. : /
Abs,
6 months ago
Looks good Breno. Nice.
6 months ago
I love the evolution of the mark - now it stays strong, but at the same time it has this light flow. Great job!
6 months ago
the right wing looks too bold and heavy compared to the left imo. maybe it should be more dynamic :) despite that – have u tried a non italic font? :D
6 months ago
bravo :)
6 months ago
This is because the earlier version haven't this wing fold that suggest a bird body. So I've planned it without the fold. Now I have to redo this proportion. Thanks, @Konstantin! :)
6 months ago