I was expecting that actually :)
Some lines have been thickened, because I tried it in different sizes and I thought this looked better.
I also think this version is more homogeneous, instead of "parts put together".
But, I know what you mean and I don't totally disagree :)
There are lots of other changes too, like angles and kerning.
I made the lines a pixel smaller just now, for Pat :) Still works at the size I'm using it for the most I think. In the process I made the stems a bit shorter than this version too. But don't think it's worth another rebound :)
8 Responses
Pro
Henric Sjösten
Some minor changes that you probably don't care about ;)
over 2 years ago
I actually prefer the first one, with slightly thinner lines. This is fantastic as well, but comparing the two I prefer the first.
over 2 years ago
Pro
Henric Sjösten
I was expecting that actually :)
Some lines have been thickened, because I tried it in different sizes and I thought this looked better.
I also think this version is more homogeneous, instead of "parts put together".
But, I know what you mean and I don't totally disagree :)
There are lots of other changes too, like angles and kerning.
over 2 years ago
I like that you've made the M's stems more curvaceous, for that reason I prefer this revision.
over 2 years ago
Pro
Henric Sjösten
Yup that too. Thanks :)
I made the lines a pixel smaller just now, for Pat :) Still works at the size I'm using it for the most I think. In the process I made the stems a bit shorter than this version too. But don't think it's worth another rebound :)
over 2 years ago
I think this version is more smooth in some curves, but I like both of them!
over 2 years ago
I dig both versions, but I definitely think this is an improvement. The subtle curvature (in the "M" for example), is a very nice touch.
over 2 years ago
Pro
Mads Burcharth
My finger hurts from pressing the like button.
over 2 years ago