So here's a slightly more detailed version of the logotype for the event graphics. Thinking of a 3d-esque lettering, but still working on other ideas for the lettering style. For the rest of the graphics, silhouettes of various skydiving elements will be added.
Do you think I should make everything perfect and straight once I go digital or keep the rough shaped to make it look more hand-rendered despite the fact that it will be digital?
Full size is attached. And once again, the '3some' part is some tongue in cheek humor that simply indicated that the event has 3 sponsors, so get those minds out of the gutter...now!
It's no Claire amibgram... but I like it! Pshh, my mind is no where near the gutter, I don't' know what you're insinuating. (Hey, you always seem to expect wiseassedness so there you go).
Anyway, on a more serious note, I really like where you're going with this one. I personally have a tendency to lean towards making things perfect and straight, but I feel this might benefit from maintaining a more hand-rendered aesthetic. I really love the little outward curve on the ends of the stems and how you've continued that in the shadow/3d shape.
6 Responses
So here's a slightly more detailed version of the logotype for the event graphics. Thinking of a 3d-esque lettering, but still working on other ideas for the lettering style. For the rest of the graphics, silhouettes of various skydiving elements will be added.
Do you think I should make everything perfect and straight once I go digital or keep the rough shaped to make it look more hand-rendered despite the fact that it will be digital?
Full size is attached. And once again, the '3some' part is some tongue in cheek humor that simply indicated that the event has 3 sponsors, so get those minds out of the gutter...now!
12 months ago
Looking great, Nikita! I'd go with clean lines when you digitize it. Shouldn't the depth perspective for 'dirty' be on the left side?
12 months ago
@Jeff Jenkins, I see what you mean. I'm going for 1 point perspective here. But what you're thinking is definitely worth exploring!
12 months ago
Ah, okay. Gotcha.
12 months ago
Nice, I dig the perspective, always looks good in vector for sure
12 months ago
It's no Claire amibgram... but I like it! Pshh, my mind is no where near the gutter, I don't' know what you're insinuating. (Hey, you always seem to expect wiseassedness so there you go).
Anyway, on a more serious note, I really like where you're going with this one. I personally have a tendency to lean towards making things perfect and straight, but I feel this might benefit from maintaining a more hand-rendered aesthetic. I really love the little outward curve on the ends of the stems and how you've continued that in the shadow/3d shape.
12 months ago