@Simon™ Thanks Simon.Yea agreed, I had quite a few simpler options in the final roundup. The mark at the top will be something secondary, far too much to be included with the type. Thanks for the thoughts!
This house-hammer is very nice ;)
I can't stop seeing a nail in your i-t-h connexion, if this t-stroke were going a bit lower, to the middle of the 'i' dot ;) Your type really made me think about construction, good job !
Hot! I love the swash under the straight-baseline version. I see what @Simon™ is saying about the curves, they feel like they are conflicting. Really beautiful letterforms in this, so smooth and nice flow!
Wow, very elegant, while still being nice and simple. Though a minor detail, I agree about the i-t ligature. I like the idea, but it seems to distract my eyes from the rest of the design.
Love this script, especially on the straight angled baseline. Really love the shape of your 'B'! Personally I quite like the 'i-t' ligature – I think if that pair was separated, the left side of the 't' crossbar would look too abrupt and too close to the 'i' dot.
The only thing that looks a little out of place to me is the extended 'R' swash in 'Construction'. I think it feels a little unnecessary and draws to much attention to itself, considering the other elements that are already there.
@Claire Coullon Thanks.Think you've hit the nail on the head. There was something bothering me with this composition, and the R accent is totally throwing it off.It was actually an element from another variation that i just put together on this version (if that makes sense ) Also I tried various things with the ITH connection, this seemed the most seamless, and connected. have one other idea i will rebound tho.
I think 'Construction Professionals' should be positioned on the opposite curve (I hope that makes sense) to the 'Buildsmiths' type (which is oh so very nice btw!) as I think the way it is at the moment takes a lot of the attention away from the company name. Great work though, I love it.
26 Responses (page 1 of 2)
Logo I've been crafting recently. had like a milllion variations
about 1 year ago
looks awesome
about 1 year ago
Looking good Ritchie. Definitely prefer the straight angled baseline version. Too many curves in this one methinks.
That mark is so strong, I think that a version with it as hero, could be totally kiff.
about 1 year ago
nice boytjie, that 'r' at the was a nice touch!
about 1 year ago
@Simon™ Thanks Simon.Yea agreed, I had quite a few simpler options in the final roundup. The mark at the top will be something secondary, far too much to be included with the type. Thanks for the thoughts!
about 1 year ago
very nice typework, agree with @Simon™ about the curves :)
about 1 year ago
Very nice!
about 1 year ago
This house-hammer is very nice ;)
I can't stop seeing a nail in your i-t-h connexion, if this t-stroke were going a bit lower, to the middle of the 'i' dot ;) Your type really made me think about construction, good job !
about 1 year ago
Love that extra thing even more. Fab work dude.
about 1 year ago
@Joachim Vu Nice! didn't even see a nail reference in there at all, but now that you say that :) Thanks!
about 1 year ago
Hot! I love the swash under the straight-baseline version. I see what @Simon™ is saying about the curves, they feel like they are conflicting. Really beautiful letterforms in this, so smooth and nice flow!
about 1 year ago
Very cool! Has a nice feel.
about 1 year ago
looking good buddy!
about 1 year ago
Very cool, unique script.
about 1 year ago
Very fine indeed.
about 1 year ago
beautiful!
about 1 year ago
Looks awesome Luke.
about 1 year ago
So flowy, nice work.
about 1 year ago
Wow, very elegant, while still being nice and simple. Though a minor detail, I agree about the i-t ligature. I like the idea, but it seems to distract my eyes from the rest of the design.
about 1 year ago
Wow this is awesome!
about 1 year ago
Love this script, especially on the straight angled baseline. Really love the shape of your 'B'! Personally I quite like the 'i-t' ligature – I think if that pair was separated, the left side of the 't' crossbar would look too abrupt and too close to the 'i' dot.
The only thing that looks a little out of place to me is the extended 'R' swash in 'Construction'. I think it feels a little unnecessary and draws to much attention to itself, considering the other elements that are already there.
about 1 year ago
@Claire Coullon Thanks.Think you've hit the nail on the head. There was something bothering me with this composition, and the R accent is totally throwing it off.It was actually an element from another variation that i just put together on this version (if that makes sense ) Also I tried various things with the ITH connection, this seemed the most seamless, and connected. have one other idea i will rebound tho.
about 1 year ago
I think 'Construction Professionals' should be positioned on the opposite curve (I hope that makes sense) to the 'Buildsmiths' type (which is oh so very nice btw!) as I think the way it is at the moment takes a lot of the attention away from the company name. Great work though, I love it.
about 1 year ago
I like 'em logos with the type!
12 months ago
Has a very nice weight to it. Love your work.
12 months ago