Groups, Illustration 1

36 Responses (page 2 of 2)

1. Zachary Foster

   Ya, I vote too for 'us'... really interested in seeing more of this. Nice element.

   Also second Matthew Smith... Poster?

   almost 2 years ago

2. Joshua Blankenship

   Literarily speaking, in the English language "man" is gender-inclusive. Don't over-think or over-complicate it, Jesse.

   1likes

   almost 2 years ago

3. Nathan Smith

   @Joshua + @Jesse

   Man (pun intended), I didn't mean to kick off a theological and/or gender equality hair-splitting debate. That certainly wasn't my intention. Hopefully the tone of my comment didn't come across as needlessly nitpicky.

   Furthermore, upon second thought, I think usage of "MAN" in the "mankind" sense is just fine.

   I should've just commented "first!" instead. :)

   1likes

   almost 2 years ago

4. Pro Rogie

   I still think dude, dudette, or homosapien would have been best. I just don't understand why nobody is considering my suggestions.

   Wait, maybe you should put "THE BIG MAN" for God. That might make it all more fun.

   1likes

   almost 2 years ago

5. Chris Wallace!

   What if you capitalize Man? That makes it gender-inclusive.

   almost 2 years ago

6. Pro Jesse Gardner

   It's all caps, Chris!

   almost 2 years ago

7. Amy Stoddard

   I think I'm in love.

   almost 2 years ago

8. Pro Ismael Burciaga

   For get man, forget woman, forget everyhing else. Use ISH :-)

   I wanna see more of this too :-)

   almost 2 years ago

9. Tyce Clee

   Bloody beautiful Jesse, well done.

   almost 2 years ago

10. Pro Shaun Moynihan

    I think man is appropriate since man was created in the image of God, as stated in Genesis. We are all part of mankind and therefore for use in the Church environment, man would be best.

    Looks awesome btw!

    almost 2 years ago

11. Pro Gedy Rivera

    Beautiful!

    almost 2 years ago