Critique encouraged, as is telling me which you prefer. :D
This is the wood version, consistent with the previous iterations.
But I've also done a white version and plan to mirror any changes to both versions.
I tried changing the layout quite a bit today, for example:
• having the language indicator right at the bottom — this was nice in theory but has practical implications: when the keyboard is brought up, the language is hidden, making it not immediately obvious which language the user is searching in.
• having the language indicator right at the top, with the search bar moved closer to the book — this looked strange, but also weakens the metaphorical connection between the book and the indicator.
The button in the search field is a single button (as in Articles.app) which will bring up the bookmarks (star) and history (clock) view.
Most of the work now is just pixel-by-pixel stuff, tweaking the tiniest details, which is tiring but rewarding work. Then I want to do some more work on the positioning, sizing and formatting of the content of the pages, after which this concept should be largely complete. :)
Finally will be the app's icon, which will be interesting — another first for me.
Also I just realised the language indicator isn't showing the correct language. Ignore that. :x
I am very conscious of the white being too over-bearing, but I also have my problems with the wood version: e.g. I'm not sure if the button really looks like a button or something you're supposed to tap; I'm not sure how difficult it will be from a technical point of view when developing the app.
I thought so, but I can not think of any idea other than to obscure the search box, or perhaps making it white on hover. it is also possible that I like the wood too :P
I like this. Though I share the worry about the buttons not being recognized. Perhaps a mix of both versions could help; the search-field with the buttons of the first shot.
Initially the wood version did have the buttons of the white version, and it looked terrible due to the huge colour contrast… but I think if I adjust the colours to fit the wood better, it could work and still look like a button. I'll do some experimenting along those lines… Thanks again for that, Bianca.
10 Responses
Critique encouraged, as is telling me which you prefer. :D
This is the wood version, consistent with the previous iterations.
But I've also done a white version and plan to mirror any changes to both versions.
I tried changing the layout quite a bit today, for example:
• having the language indicator right at the bottom — this was nice in theory but has practical implications: when the keyboard is brought up, the language is hidden, making it not immediately obvious which language the user is searching in.
• having the language indicator right at the top, with the search bar moved closer to the book — this looked strange, but also weakens the metaphorical connection between the book and the indicator.
The button in the search field is a single button (as in Articles.app) which will bring up the bookmarks (star) and history (clock) view.
Most of the work now is just pixel-by-pixel stuff, tweaking the tiniest details, which is tiring but rewarding work. Then I want to do some more work on the positioning, sizing and formatting of the content of the pages, after which this concept should be largely complete. :)
Finally will be the app's icon, which will be interesting — another first for me.
Also I just realised the language indicator isn't showing the correct language. Ignore that. :x
about 1 year ago
Pro
Manu Gamero ☁
I prefer this much more. I think the white stands out too much. Even so, both have an exquisite design!
about 1 year ago
I am very conscious of the white being too over-bearing, but I also have my problems with the wood version: e.g. I'm not sure if the button really looks like a button or something you're supposed to tap; I'm not sure how difficult it will be from a technical point of view when developing the app.
Thank you, Manu. :)
about 1 year ago
Pro
Manu Gamero ☁
I thought so, but I can not think of any idea other than to obscure the search box, or perhaps making it white on hover. it is also possible that I like the wood too :P
about 1 year ago
Pro
Bady
I think it is nice man :) good work!
about 1 year ago
Pro
Bianca
I like this. Though I share the worry about the buttons not being recognized. Perhaps a mix of both versions could help; the search-field with the buttons of the first shot.
about 1 year ago
Thanks, Bady and Bianca. :)
Initially the wood version did have the buttons of the white version, and it looked terrible due to the huge colour contrast… but I think if I adjust the colours to fit the wood better, it could work and still look like a button. I'll do some experimenting along those lines… Thanks again for that, Bianca.
about 1 year ago
Pro
Cameron Dearsley
The wood looks awesome! The arrows appear to have one pixel out of place (on the upper portion), though.
about 1 year ago
Can't believe I hadn't seen that! My excuse is that I've not yet focused properly on the content yet - that's next up, I think.
Thank you, Cameron. :)
about 1 year ago
Love this.
3 months ago