This is gorgeous. My only suggestion would be to maybe extend the lines at the top of the bottom a tiny amount left and right - for some reason, although I think they're dead on geometrically, there's something about the strength of the M and D in Method in particular and the butt of the Ampersand that make it seem like the text is pushing out beyond the square you've got.
Do you know what I mean? It's like when in typography the O can't sit on the baseline because otherwise it looks like it's flying, or the reason that the floor of the Acropolis raises slightly towards the centre otherwise the illusion is that it's got a depression in it.
Lookin' great! (...and that was a spot-on suggestion from Mr. Mall, as well.)
One thing John Langdon taught me eons ago was to just ever-so-slightly extend any "O"s or curved glyphs beyond the hard vertical alignment that you would naturally want to align it against. The "&" would probably fit this case; the outside curve of it might want to sit a pixel or two beyond the left edge of the "M"
15 Responses
Pro
Phil Coffman
Changed "Method" to a more pure use of Knockout after Dan's comment.
about 2 years ago
This really balances out the whole logo. Great job!
about 2 years ago
Pro
Chris Bowler
Great progression Phil.
One other thought: the spacing between the text and the lines appears uneven (although it's probably equal) — the top looks just slightly cramped.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Dan Mall
Beautiful. Much more balanced proportions.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Jake Stutzman
I like how you've tightened things. Feels altogether now.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Jake Przespo
I'm liking this iteration the most out of all of them. Nice work Phil.
about 2 years ago
Winner.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Matthew Anderson
Gotta love Dribble, eh? Fantastic end result, Phil.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Jordan Dobson
Very nice! The adjustment worked perfectly.
about 2 years ago
Love it.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Trent Walton
Excellent work... Way to push those pixels.
about 2 years ago
This is gorgeous. My only suggestion would be to maybe extend the lines at the top of the bottom a tiny amount left and right - for some reason, although I think they're dead on geometrically, there's something about the strength of the M and D in Method in particular and the butt of the Ampersand that make it seem like the text is pushing out beyond the square you've got.
Do you know what I mean? It's like when in typography the O can't sit on the baseline because otherwise it looks like it's flying, or the reason that the floor of the Acropolis raises slightly towards the centre otherwise the illusion is that it's got a depression in it.
I'm rambling. I'll stop now.
about 2 years ago
I have to say I believe Mr. Coates is spot on. Just a pixel on each side would go a long way.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Chris Cashdollar
Lookin' great! (...and that was a spot-on suggestion from Mr. Mall, as well.)
One thing John Langdon taught me eons ago was to just ever-so-slightly extend any "O"s or curved glyphs beyond the hard vertical alignment that you would naturally want to align it against. The "&" would probably fit this case; the outside curve of it might want to sit a pixel or two beyond the left edge of the "M"
about 2 years ago
Pro
Phil Coffman
@Joshua & @Tom - I can see how that could help. Thanks for the suggestion!
@Chris - Yep, you're right. The "&" needs to shift a tiny bit to the left.
about 2 years ago