Working on a logo for a new site I'm developing. This is Option A which is a side by side logo. This obviously reads very easily, but I also have Option B which is a stacked version and a bit more playful.
It seems like a lot of people like the other version but I'm *really* digging this one. There's a simple beauty to it that draws my eye and I can see it working nicely on the web. The only thing that I might try is making the "M" a bit smaller or do something with the "C". It feels a bit unbalanced. But... when used in a header it may not feel that way. Awesome work.
5 Responses
Pro
Phil Coffman
Working on a logo for a new site I'm developing. This is Option A which is a side by side logo. This obviously reads very easily, but I also have Option B which is a stacked version and a bit more playful.
Thoughts?
about 2 years ago
It’s very pretty but it’s not a logo. It has to be more individual in my opinion.
If you stick with that the "ft" is asking for a connection. :)
about 2 years ago
Pro
Phil Coffman
I disagree with you saying this isn't a logo, but your comment about the "f" and "t" asking for a connection is interesting. I might explore that.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Jonathan Bowden
i really like this one best, but i think "craft" needs a slight variation in captilization or visual something. sort of lik method has the caps M.
about 2 years ago
Pro
Ryan Essmaker
It seems like a lot of people like the other version but I'm *really* digging this one. There's a simple beauty to it that draws my eye and I can see it working nicely on the web. The only thing that I might try is making the "M" a bit smaller or do something with the "C". It feels a bit unbalanced. But... when used in a header it may not feel that way. Awesome work.
about 2 years ago